<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Stodgy Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:33:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Trayvon Martin by Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2772&#038;cpage=1#comment-9317</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2772#comment-9317</guid>
		<description>Heard that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grape Nuts &amp; Stodgy Sweatshirts by Ernie</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2107&#038;cpage=1#comment-8195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2107#comment-8195</guid>
		<description>Chris, i love your sweatshirt blue hoodie which I&#039;m wearing all night while asleep, next time I&#039;m gonna order the color gray, thanks a lot, very comfy sweatshirt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, i love your sweatshirt blue hoodie which I&#8217;m wearing all night while asleep, next time I&#8217;m gonna order the color gray, thanks a lot, very comfy sweatshirt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goodbye, iTunes. Hello, Amazon Cloud Player. by ciekawe artykuly</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2454&#038;cpage=1#comment-5413</link>
		<dc:creator>ciekawe artykuly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2454#comment-5413</guid>
		<description>magnificent issues altogether, you just gained a new reader. What would you recommend about your post that you made some days in the past? Any sure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>magnificent issues altogether, you just gained a new reader. What would you recommend about your post that you made some days in the past? Any sure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brad Pitt, BP, and Greedy Corporations by Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=1825&#038;cpage=1#comment-4036</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=1825#comment-4036</guid>
		<description>How do modern era celebrities get so incredibly rich? It&#039;s not as simple as making movies and selling tickets anymore. Major studios and TV networks are now owned by giant corporations which also own entities within other industries. Their strategies to maximize profits are more calculated than ever.

For example, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have had a special relationship with NBC for years. Countrywide and other banking entities have been sponsors. Not to mention Lowes, Home Depot, and Electrolux. But it&#039;s not as simple as selling ad space anymore. NBC is owned by GE. GE also owns at least one major production studeo and entities within the banking industry.

Giant corporations have been working together for years with major media outlets to increase profits. Part of their strategy has been to cross-market their products and services. Also to affiliate with celebrities and create the illusion of &#039;good will&#039;. When in fact, the idea is to increase awareness and demand for every product and service provided within the umbrella of parent companies and corporate sponsors.
New Orleans is known worldwide for it&#039;s unique culture. Tourism has been big business in the area for decades. Make it Right is now affiliated with Hyatt Regency. A high end hotel right next to the New Orleans Stadium. There is already a giant dual promotion planned for next spring. Ellen Degeneres (NBC juggernaut) is going to play a major role in this dual promotion. Housing, the related financing and home improvements have also been big business for decades.

If the Lower Ninth Ward is redeveloped with fewer poor people, property values will be increased along with profits made by all those affiliated with Make it Right. The web of affiliation with Pitt, NBC, GE, Hyatt, Lowes, Home Depot, and the banking industry is sprawling to say the least. The operation has also been used to promote at least one &#039;home improvement&#039; TV show that I know of. Holmes on Homes. I don&#039;t recall the network but the show is designed to sell more high end home improvements. It&#039;s all very calculated.

I&#039;m telling you that good will has become big business.

If any of you have some more shady details, I&#039;d like to read them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do modern era celebrities get so incredibly rich? It&#8217;s not as simple as making movies and selling tickets anymore. Major studios and TV networks are now owned by giant corporations which also own entities within other industries. Their strategies to maximize profits are more calculated than ever.</p>
<p>For example, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have had a special relationship with NBC for years. Countrywide and other banking entities have been sponsors. Not to mention Lowes, Home Depot, and Electrolux. But it&#8217;s not as simple as selling ad space anymore. NBC is owned by GE. GE also owns at least one major production studeo and entities within the banking industry.</p>
<p>Giant corporations have been working together for years with major media outlets to increase profits. Part of their strategy has been to cross-market their products and services. Also to affiliate with celebrities and create the illusion of &#8216;good will&#8217;. When in fact, the idea is to increase awareness and demand for every product and service provided within the umbrella of parent companies and corporate sponsors.<br />
New Orleans is known worldwide for it&#8217;s unique culture. Tourism has been big business in the area for decades. Make it Right is now affiliated with Hyatt Regency. A high end hotel right next to the New Orleans Stadium. There is already a giant dual promotion planned for next spring. Ellen Degeneres (NBC juggernaut) is going to play a major role in this dual promotion. Housing, the related financing and home improvements have also been big business for decades.</p>
<p>If the Lower Ninth Ward is redeveloped with fewer poor people, property values will be increased along with profits made by all those affiliated with Make it Right. The web of affiliation with Pitt, NBC, GE, Hyatt, Lowes, Home Depot, and the banking industry is sprawling to say the least. The operation has also been used to promote at least one &#8216;home improvement&#8217; TV show that I know of. Holmes on Homes. I don&#8217;t recall the network but the show is designed to sell more high end home improvements. It&#8217;s all very calculated.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m telling you that good will has become big business.</p>
<p>If any of you have some more shady details, I&#8217;d like to read them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brad Pitt, BP, and Greedy Corporations by Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=1825&#038;cpage=1#comment-4033</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=1825#comment-4033</guid>
		<description>The rich and famous do not want to be seen as &#039;pigs&#039; or go down in history as &#039;villains&#039;. They want to be seen as &#039;heros&#039; and go down in history as &#039;humanitarians&#039;. The market for their product has become global. The fan base has become global. Therefore, the &#039;humanitarian&#039; effort and &#039;good will&#039; PR machine has gone global.  These &#039;humanitarian&#039; efforts and &#039;good deeds&#039; are not chosen to address the greatest need or injustice. They are chosen almost exclusively to appeal to the largest demographic for their respective commercial products. The largest fan base.  Efficiency or effect is of little or no concern. Its all about PR, marketing, image, and fame.

This is why the rich and famous have all taken up &#039;philanthropy&#039; or &#039;good will&#039; around the world. This is why so many have &#039;schools&#039; or &#039;foundations&#039; in their name. This is why so many play golf or appear on a TV game show for &#039;charity&#039;. This is why so many sign motorcycles, other merchandise, or auction off their own &#039;personal effects&#039; for &#039;charity&#039;. This is why so many have TV shows with a &#039;charitable&#039; gimmick. This is why so many arrange photo ops with wounded veterans, firefighters, or sick children. This is why so many have adopted children from around the world (Which they always pay others to care for full time. The hired professionals are sworn by legal contract to confidentiality. Not allowed to discuss or appear in public with the children they care for. Those &#039;photo&#039; and &#039;interview&#039; opportunities are reserved exclusively for the rich and famous &#039;adoptive&#039; parents.). This is why every &#039;humanitarian&#039; effort and &#039;good deed&#039; is plastered all over the media worldwide. Its not about &#039;humanity&#039; or &#039;good will&#039;. Its all about marketing, image, fame, and PROFIT. This is why we are so often reminded of their respective &#039;good deeds&#039; or &#039;humanitarian&#039; efforts shortly before or after the release of their latest commercial product. 

Charitywatch.org and Charitynavigator.org are both non-profit charity watchdogs. Of all the well rated charities (about 1500) only three are closely affiliated with celebrities. Michael J Fox (not the primary donor), Tiger Woods (not the primary donor), and Bill Clinton (not the primary donor). That&#039;s three well rated celebrity foundations out of 1500. In general, celebrity foundations run like crap because they blow half the money on private jet rides, five star accommodations, and PR crews.

The fans have been terribly misled. For example:

Virtually every penny &#039;donated&#039; by Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt to date has come from repeated sales of baby photos. With each sale, the baby money goes to the &#039;Jolie-Pitt&#039; foundation. A foundation which has never done anything but shelter funds. The &#039;donation&#039; is immediately publicized worldwide.     

When Jolie or Pitt have a new movie to promote, a portion is then donated from their own &#039;foundation&#039; to a legitimate charity. This leaves their ignorant fans under the impression that &#039;another&#039; donation has been made. When in fact, its the same baby money being transferred again and again. Another portion is blown on private jet rides, super-exclusive accommodations, photo ops, and PR crap. This saves Jolie and Pitt millions in travel/stay expenses and their respective studios tens of millions in advertising. It&#039;s all very calculated. 

Of course, Jolie and Pitt could simply endorse any of the 1500 most efficient and effective charities. Of course, the baby money would go much further and do far more good if it were donated to such charities to begin with. 

But that would be too boring. 

The &#039;Make it Right&#039; Foundation took in over $12,000,000 the first year alone. Tens of millions overall. Brad Pitt has never been the primary donor, planner, or designer. He is a figurehead and salesman with a position on the board of advisors. Nothing more. Still, he has been showered with glorious praise by fellow celebrities and media outlets around the world. Again, the fans have been terribly misled. 

In order to move into a &#039;green&#039; home, the innocent victims of Katrina are required to provide a property deed, meet a number of financial requirements, and pay an average of $150,000 UP FRONT. The difference is offered in cheap loans or on occasion (according to the website) forgiven. To date, only a few dozen former home owners have qualified. 

The &#039;Make it Right&#039; foundation was never intended to help the lower income residents of New Orleans reclaim anything lost in Katrina. In fact, &#039;Make it Right&#039; is part of a calculated effort to rebuild the Lower Ninth Ward without them. Part of a calculated effort to raise property values in the area by displacing the poor. They are by design, excluded. Unable to qualify.
 
Of course, Brad Pitt could have simply endorsed &#039;Habitat For Humanity&#039;. A well known, proven, and efficient home building operation. Of course, the tens of millions in funding would have gone MUCH further.

But that would be too boring.
 
Big name celebrities have no desire to make the world a better place. 

Their primary goal is to appear as if they do.

It&#039;s a sham. Good will has become big business. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rich and famous do not want to be seen as &#8216;pigs&#8217; or go down in history as &#8216;villains&#8217;. They want to be seen as &#8216;heros&#8217; and go down in history as &#8216;humanitarians&#8217;. The market for their product has become global. The fan base has become global. Therefore, the &#8216;humanitarian&#8217; effort and &#8216;good will&#8217; PR machine has gone global.  These &#8216;humanitarian&#8217; efforts and &#8216;good deeds&#8217; are not chosen to address the greatest need or injustice. They are chosen almost exclusively to appeal to the largest demographic for their respective commercial products. The largest fan base.  Efficiency or effect is of little or no concern. Its all about PR, marketing, image, and fame.</p>
<p>This is why the rich and famous have all taken up &#8216;philanthropy&#8217; or &#8216;good will&#8217; around the world. This is why so many have &#8216;schools&#8217; or &#8216;foundations&#8217; in their name. This is why so many play golf or appear on a TV game show for &#8216;charity&#8217;. This is why so many sign motorcycles, other merchandise, or auction off their own &#8216;personal effects&#8217; for &#8216;charity&#8217;. This is why so many have TV shows with a &#8216;charitable&#8217; gimmick. This is why so many arrange photo ops with wounded veterans, firefighters, or sick children. This is why so many have adopted children from around the world (Which they always pay others to care for full time. The hired professionals are sworn by legal contract to confidentiality. Not allowed to discuss or appear in public with the children they care for. Those &#8216;photo&#8217; and &#8216;interview&#8217; opportunities are reserved exclusively for the rich and famous &#8216;adoptive&#8217; parents.). This is why every &#8216;humanitarian&#8217; effort and &#8216;good deed&#8217; is plastered all over the media worldwide. Its not about &#8216;humanity&#8217; or &#8216;good will&#8217;. Its all about marketing, image, fame, and PROFIT. This is why we are so often reminded of their respective &#8216;good deeds&#8217; or &#8216;humanitarian&#8217; efforts shortly before or after the release of their latest commercial product. </p>
<p>Charitywatch.org and Charitynavigator.org are both non-profit charity watchdogs. Of all the well rated charities (about 1500) only three are closely affiliated with celebrities. Michael J Fox (not the primary donor), Tiger Woods (not the primary donor), and Bill Clinton (not the primary donor). That&#8217;s three well rated celebrity foundations out of 1500. In general, celebrity foundations run like crap because they blow half the money on private jet rides, five star accommodations, and PR crews.</p>
<p>The fans have been terribly misled. For example:</p>
<p>Virtually every penny &#8216;donated&#8217; by Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt to date has come from repeated sales of baby photos. With each sale, the baby money goes to the &#8216;Jolie-Pitt&#8217; foundation. A foundation which has never done anything but shelter funds. The &#8216;donation&#8217; is immediately publicized worldwide.     </p>
<p>When Jolie or Pitt have a new movie to promote, a portion is then donated from their own &#8216;foundation&#8217; to a legitimate charity. This leaves their ignorant fans under the impression that &#8216;another&#8217; donation has been made. When in fact, its the same baby money being transferred again and again. Another portion is blown on private jet rides, super-exclusive accommodations, photo ops, and PR crap. This saves Jolie and Pitt millions in travel/stay expenses and their respective studios tens of millions in advertising. It&#8217;s all very calculated. </p>
<p>Of course, Jolie and Pitt could simply endorse any of the 1500 most efficient and effective charities. Of course, the baby money would go much further and do far more good if it were donated to such charities to begin with. </p>
<p>But that would be too boring. </p>
<p>The &#8216;Make it Right&#8217; Foundation took in over $12,000,000 the first year alone. Tens of millions overall. Brad Pitt has never been the primary donor, planner, or designer. He is a figurehead and salesman with a position on the board of advisors. Nothing more. Still, he has been showered with glorious praise by fellow celebrities and media outlets around the world. Again, the fans have been terribly misled. </p>
<p>In order to move into a &#8216;green&#8217; home, the innocent victims of Katrina are required to provide a property deed, meet a number of financial requirements, and pay an average of $150,000 UP FRONT. The difference is offered in cheap loans or on occasion (according to the website) forgiven. To date, only a few dozen former home owners have qualified. </p>
<p>The &#8216;Make it Right&#8217; foundation was never intended to help the lower income residents of New Orleans reclaim anything lost in Katrina. In fact, &#8216;Make it Right&#8217; is part of a calculated effort to rebuild the Lower Ninth Ward without them. Part of a calculated effort to raise property values in the area by displacing the poor. They are by design, excluded. Unable to qualify.<br />
 <br />
Of course, Brad Pitt could have simply endorsed &#8216;Habitat For Humanity&#8217;. A well known, proven, and efficient home building operation. Of course, the tens of millions in funding would have gone MUCH further.</p>
<p>But that would be too boring.<br />
 <br />
Big name celebrities have no desire to make the world a better place. </p>
<p>Their primary goal is to appear as if they do.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sham. Good will has become big business. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Convert Your Car to a Hybrid for $8.99 #leed by Chris Chaten</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2722&#038;cpage=1#comment-3948</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Chaten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2722#comment-3948</guid>
		<description>Ha, nope, that&#039;s the turbo model.  Mine is rated at 23 combined mpg.  I get closer to 28 in real life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, nope, that&#8217;s the turbo model.  Mine is rated at 23 combined mpg.  I get closer to 28 in real life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Convert Your Car to a Hybrid for $8.99 #leed by Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2722&#038;cpage=1#comment-3947</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2722#comment-3947</guid>
		<description>I do believe your Saab 92X has even lower fuel efficiency than the hybrid Escalade.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/21016.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe your Saab 92X has even lower fuel efficiency than the hybrid Escalade.<br />
<a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/21016.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/21016.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dose of Inspiration: I&#8217;m a PC, but I Appreciate Steve Jobs by &#8220;Death is the destination we all share.&#8221; Steve Jobs: 1955 &#8211; 2011 &#171; Stodgy Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=169&#038;cpage=1#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Death is the destination we all share.&#8221; Steve Jobs: 1955 &#8211; 2011 &#171; Stodgy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 03:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=169#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>[...] I posted this speech a bit ago, and it&#8217;s worthy of a re-watch today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I posted this speech a bit ago, and it&#8217;s worthy of a re-watch today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPad 2 Bug: Wrong Subject Line in Threaded Email #uat #ipad by Re: Does Apples Mail App For iPad Have A Subject Line Caching Bug? &#124; Branding Apps</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468&#038;cpage=1#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Re: Does Apples Mail App For iPad Have A Subject Line Caching Bug? &#124; Branding Apps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>[...] his heard-scratching moment through a post on his blog, Chris Chaten explains his run-in with Apple’s own Mail app for the iPad displaying incorrect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his heard-scratching moment through a post on his blog, Chris Chaten explains his run-in with Apple’s own Mail app for the iPad displaying incorrect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chipotle, Chick-fil-a, and Nirvana by Eric Wilbanks</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2520&#038;cpage=1#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Wilbanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2520#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>Haha! So true &amp; couldn&#039;t agree more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! So true &amp; couldn&#8217;t agree more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Earth for Google Maps: Pretty Pictures by 3D Hottness Added to @DenisonU Campus on Google Earth &#171; Stodgy Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=1217&#038;cpage=1#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator>3D Hottness Added to @DenisonU Campus on Google Earth &#171; Stodgy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=1217#comment-3087</guid>
		<description>[...] Early last year, Google added the ability to render 3D buildings directly through the browser.  It&#8217;s been a long time coming, but my alma mater, Denison University, has added 3D renderings of the campus buildings to Google Earth.  It&#8217;s a fairly faithful rendering, and it&#8217;s fun flying around the campus checking out the old haunts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Early last year, Google added the ability to render 3D buildings directly through the browser.  It&#8217;s been a long time coming, but my alma mater, Denison University, has added 3D renderings of the campus buildings to Google Earth.  It&#8217;s a fairly faithful rendering, and it&#8217;s fun flying around the campus checking out the old haunts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Design of Everyday Things: ChapStick by Shae harden</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2586&#038;cpage=1#comment-2855</link>
		<dc:creator>Shae harden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 01:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2586#comment-2855</guid>
		<description>I agreee!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreee!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blue Collar, White Collar: Young &amp; Unemployed in Illinois by Unemployment Rate, Degrees, and J.D.&#8217;s &#171; Stodgy Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=914&#038;cpage=1#comment-2425</link>
		<dc:creator>Unemployment Rate, Degrees, and J.D.&#8217;s &#171; Stodgy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=914#comment-2425</guid>
		<description>[...] little over a year ago, I posted about asymmetrical unemployment. It&#8217;s time to revisit this. The headline unemployment rate reported on the news and debated by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] little over a year ago, I posted about asymmetrical unemployment. It&#8217;s time to revisit this. The headline unemployment rate reported on the news and debated by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things Heard in Canada: A New Album from Sloan #eh by Emerging Artist: Lookout for Rockie Fresh #chicago @rockiefresh &#171; Stodgy Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2502&#038;cpage=1#comment-2180</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerging Artist: Lookout for Rockie Fresh #chicago @rockiefresh &#171; Stodgy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2502#comment-2180</guid>
		<description>[...] last music post was about an old Canadian alt-rock band.  This time I&#8217;m flipping to new school rap in my own backyard.  Rockie Fresh, a 20 year-old [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last music post was about an old Canadian alt-rock band.  This time I&#8217;m flipping to new school rap in my own backyard.  Rockie Fresh, a 20 year-old [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goodbye, iTunes. Hello, Amazon Cloud Player. by Things Heard in Canada: A New Album from Sloan #eh &#171; Stodgy Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2454&#038;cpage=1#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Things Heard in Canada: A New Album from Sloan #eh &#171; Stodgy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 01:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2454#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>[...] The Double Cross.  It&#8217;s not bad.  I was able to buy it from and listen to the rest through Amazon CloudPlayer on my iPad.  I dig [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Double Cross.  It&#8217;s not bad.  I was able to buy it from and listen to the rest through Amazon CloudPlayer on my iPad.  I dig [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s okay to cheer. by Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2480&#038;cpage=1#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 03:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2480#comment-1904</guid>
		<description>I agree we should cheer.  Cheer for the elimination of the single greatest threat to our way of life.  Cheer for the hope of keeping more Americans alive -- both overseas and at home.  However, we should never cheer for the death of a human life.  We might recognize that his death was instrumental in achieving a greater peace, but the death of another should never be a source of joy, no matter how terrible that person&#039;s actions were.  And I can&#039;t help but disagree with the President&#039;s comment that &quot;justice was served.&quot;  Justice will never be served for the families of the victims of 9/11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree we should cheer.  Cheer for the elimination of the single greatest threat to our way of life.  Cheer for the hope of keeping more Americans alive &#8212; both overseas and at home.  However, we should never cheer for the death of a human life.  We might recognize that his death was instrumental in achieving a greater peace, but the death of another should never be a source of joy, no matter how terrible that person&#8217;s actions were.  And I can&#8217;t help but disagree with the President&#8217;s comment that &#8220;justice was served.&#8221;  Justice will never be served for the families of the victims of 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPad 2 Bug: Wrong Subject Line in Threaded Email #uat #ipad by The White iPhone, iCloud Rumors, And A 1994 Tablet Prediction Made News In Week That Was &#124; Apps Affair</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468&#038;cpage=1#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>The White iPhone, iCloud Rumors, And A 1994 Tablet Prediction Made News In Week That Was &#124; Apps Affair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 18:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>[...] &#104;&#105;&#115; heard-scratching moment through a post &#111;&#110; &#104;&#105;&#115; blog, Chris Chaten &#099;&#108;&#097;&#114;&#105;&#102;&#105;&#101;&#115; &#104;&#105;&#115; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#104;&#105;&#115; heard-scratching moment through a post &#111;&#110; &#104;&#105;&#115; blog, Chris Chaten &#099;&#108;&#097;&#114;&#105;&#102;&#105;&#101;&#115; &#104;&#105;&#115; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPad 2 Bug: Wrong Subject Line in Threaded Email #uat #ipad by The White iPhone, iCloud Rumors, And A 1994 Tablet Prediction Made News In Week That Was -- AppAdvice</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468&#038;cpage=1#comment-1885</link>
		<dc:creator>The White iPhone, iCloud Rumors, And A 1994 Tablet Prediction Made News In Week That Was -- AppAdvice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 15:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468#comment-1885</guid>
		<description>[...] his heard-scratching moment through a post on his blog, Chris Chaten explains his run-in with Apple&#8217;s own Mail app for the iPad displaying incorrect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his heard-scratching moment through a post on his blog, Chris Chaten explains his run-in with Apple&#8217;s own Mail app for the iPad displaying incorrect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPad 2 Bug: Wrong Subject Line in Threaded Email #uat #ipad by Does Apple’s Mail App For iPad Have A Subject Line Caching Bug? &#124; Apps Affair</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468&#038;cpage=1#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Apple’s Mail App For iPad Have A Subject Line Caching Bug? &#124; Apps Affair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 06:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>[...] &#104;&#105;&#115; heard-scratching moment through a post &#111;&#110; &#104;&#105;&#115; blog, Chris Chaten &#099;&#108;&#097;&#114;&#105;&#102;&#105;&#101;&#115; &#104;&#105;&#115; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#104;&#105;&#115; heard-scratching moment through a post &#111;&#110; &#104;&#105;&#115; blog, Chris Chaten &#099;&#108;&#097;&#114;&#105;&#102;&#105;&#101;&#115; &#104;&#105;&#115; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPad 2 Bug: Wrong Subject Line in Threaded Email #uat #ipad by Chris Chaten</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468&#038;cpage=1#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Chaten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>Nope. Didn&#039;t know. Is there a way to video screen capture on ipad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope. Didn&#8217;t know. Is there a way to video screen capture on ipad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPad 2 Bug: Wrong Subject Line in Threaded Email #uat #ipad by iDude</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468&#038;cpage=1#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>iDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>OMG, screenshots taken with a camera.

Did you know that you can take proper screenshots on an iPad by pressing home and lock buttons simultaneously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, screenshots taken with a camera.</p>
<p>Did you know that you can take proper screenshots on an iPad by pressing home and lock buttons simultaneously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPad 2 Bug: Wrong Subject Line in Threaded Email #uat #ipad by Does Apple's Mail App For iPad Have A Subject Line Caching Bug? -- AppAdvice</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468&#038;cpage=1#comment-1866</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Apple's Mail App For iPad Have A Subject Line Caching Bug? -- AppAdvice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468#comment-1866</guid>
		<description>[...] his heard-scratching moment through a post on his blog, Chris Chaten explains his run-in with Apple&#8217;s own Mail app for the iPad displaying incorrect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his heard-scratching moment through a post on his blog, Chris Chaten explains his run-in with Apple&#8217;s own Mail app for the iPad displaying incorrect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPad 2 Bug: Wrong Subject Line in Threaded Email #uat #ipad by Does Apple's Mail App For iPad Have A Subject Line Caching Bug? -- AppAdvice</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468&#038;cpage=1#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Apple's Mail App For iPad Have A Subject Line Caching Bug? -- AppAdvice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2468#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>[...] his heard-scratching moment through a post on his blog, Chris Chaten explains his run-in with Apple&#8217;s own Mail app for the iPad displaying incorrect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his heard-scratching moment through a post on his blog, Chris Chaten explains his run-in with Apple&#8217;s own Mail app for the iPad displaying incorrect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Company Loyalty Really Dead? Studying CEO Tenure (Part 1) by Chris Chaten</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2089&#038;cpage=1#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Chaten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2089#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;m trying to measure here is the assumption that successful executives constantly are switching firms, which, I believe, the data above disprove. I&#039;m not trying to measure if they move once they are CEO. I&#039;m trying to measure the movement that got them to that point. 

And, by and large, most people hired as CEO rose through one company and then took over that company or switched to take the top job somewhere else. They didn&#039;t switch a ton mid-career. This is more applicable to most people than what they do after they are CEO, because, well, most people are not CEOs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;m trying to measure here is the assumption that successful executives constantly are switching firms, which, I believe, the data above disprove. I&#8217;m not trying to measure if they move once they are CEO. I&#8217;m trying to measure the movement that got them to that point. </p>
<p>And, by and large, most people hired as CEO rose through one company and then took over that company or switched to take the top job somewhere else. They didn&#8217;t switch a ton mid-career. This is more applicable to most people than what they do after they are CEO, because, well, most people are not CEOs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Company Loyalty Really Dead? Studying CEO Tenure (Part 1) by David</title>
		<link>http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2089&#038;cpage=1#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stodgyclothes.com/blog/?p=2089#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but if we&#039;re interested in CEOs, shouldn&#039;t we be looking at their longevity as CEOs? You show these 3 individuals as having a large amount of tenure at GE, but not as CEOs. Immelt is still at GE, but his &#039;tenure&#039; would fall to less than 10 years if you only consider his time as CEO. Nardelli spent less than 7 years at Home Depot and just 2 years at Chrysler. McNerney was 5 years at 3M and is currently CEO of Boeing, 5 years into his time as CEO there. So, while your article raises some interesting points, I think you fail to address the specific issue of CEOs, and how long they stay at one company in that position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but if we&#8217;re interested in CEOs, shouldn&#8217;t we be looking at their longevity as CEOs? You show these 3 individuals as having a large amount of tenure at GE, but not as CEOs. Immelt is still at GE, but his &#8216;tenure&#8217; would fall to less than 10 years if you only consider his time as CEO. Nardelli spent less than 7 years at Home Depot and just 2 years at Chrysler. McNerney was 5 years at 3M and is currently CEO of Boeing, 5 years into his time as CEO there. So, while your article raises some interesting points, I think you fail to address the specific issue of CEOs, and how long they stay at one company in that position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

